01 — THE GRID-FORMING CASE
European grids are running with progressively less synchronous generation and more inverter-coupled renewable capacity. The system services synchronous machines provided automatically — voltage support, inertia, fault-current contribution — now have to be procured from inverters. The inverters that can do it are grid-forming, not grid-following.
Grid-forming and grid-following are not the same hardware. A grid-following inverter measures an existing voltage and frequency reference and feeds current into it. Without that external reference, it can’t operate. A grid-forming inverter generates the voltage and frequency reference itself, behaves like a synchronous machine on the bus, and remains stable at high inverter penetration. During high-renewable periods in ENTSO-E zones, the grid-following population needs grid-forming assets nearby to remain stable — and those periods are lengthening every year.
ENTSO-E is moving grid-forming from optional to required. In November 2025 ENTSO-E published its Phase II technical report on grid-forming requirements, drafted into the upcoming NC RfG 2.0 amendment — once adopted by the European Commission, grid-forming capability becomes binding for new storage and renewable plants above 1 MW. National frameworks are running ahead: GB Grid Code GC0137, German VDE-AR-N 4120 and 4130, Nordic FCR-D specifications. New utility-scale BESS interconnection requests in 2026 are increasingly priced against grid-forming-capable assets as the baseline, not the upgrade.
Revenue stacking is what justifies the capex. No single ancillary product alone justifies a utility BESS at current price levels. Stacking does. FCR-D for primary frequency response, FFR for sub-second injection, aFRR for secondary balancing, plus system-strength service contracts (in markets that have them) and black-start tendering, layered on top of energy arbitrage. Grid-forming capability is what unlocks all of these simultaneously rather than a subset.
02 — WHAT THE BATTERY DOES
03 — INTEGRATION ARCHITECTURE
Mode A
Mode B
Mode C
04 — SIZING LOGIC
Lever 01 — Power
Lever 02 — Duration
Lever 03 — Energy
Rule of thumb
FCR-D bid 5–20 MW: typically 3–10 MWh, single or paired containerized blocks. Stacked FCR-D + FFR + aFRR 20–50 MW: 15–40 MWh, multi-container at HV interconnection. System-strength 50 MW+: 40–150 MWh, multi-substation distributed architecture. Detailed sizing confirms against TSO bidding rules and the project’s stacked-product strategy.
05 — RECOMMENDED HENLEY PLATFORM
06 — REFERENCE PROJECTS
Note from engineering
Henley Power supplies grid-forming PCS as standard across the utility BESS platform. Deployed grid-forming references in commissioned operation are mostly Chinese provincial — Inner Mongolia, Ningxia, Hebei, Shandong — under State Grid and Southern Grid interconnection rules. European TSO-qualified projects under ENTSO-E network code are in active development with our European partners.
TSO qualification — the formal sign-off that the asset meets a specific operator’s interconnection requirements (50Hertz, TenneT, Energinet, RTE, National Grid ESO, EirGrid) — is per-project at commissioning, run against that operator’s current grid code revision and witnessed test schedule. Pre-commissioning compliance documentation, type-test reports, and the technical pack from Chinese provincial deployments are shared after NDA on request.
If your project needs a fully ENTSO-E-qualified deployed reference as a pre-condition to specification, we’ll say so openly rather than over-promise. Browse current project portfolio →
07 — FAQ
08 — RELATED SOLUTIONS